do you ever try reading what you've attempted to write prior to hitting the submit button? ('try' because it seems highly likely your reading and writing skills are equally abyssmal; if you read at a higher level, i can't imagine most of your stuff making any more sense to you than it does to the rest of us.)

why not try doing it now?

i'm guessing your intention was to jab moderateman for speaking freely in reaction to an idiotic comment you posted to one of his threads. when you pushed a lil harder and tried to play it off as a joke**, it prolly occured to him yet once again--as it has numerous times to many of the rest of us--cutting you off made more sense than wasting any more time and virtual paper.

by posting this gibberish you proved him right.

first, you start off by claiming his response calls into question the validity of a ridiculous partisan mistruth--the sort of mindless slogan to which only an idiot subscribes.

you then cite more 'evidence' of that specific jingo's jingoistic inaccuracy--which causes me to more strongly suspect you're one of the idiotic subscribers to whom i refer above).

if my suspicions are correct, you then demonstrate you're not just some idiot--but some sorta super-idiot--because you yourself admit to having done what you claim is only done by others.

why you drag colgene into this is beyond me. if you're gonna assert a claim of unlimited free speach, how do you then justify limiting it to anyone else. i could be wrong but i can't recall gene blacklisting or deleting anyone's comments--even yours.

last, but perhaps most important of all, you show total ignorance of the concept of free speach as an inherent and/or constitutional right. working backwards, ju isn't a government entity or publicly owned real property so any appeal invoking the first amendment ain't gonna fly. as a registered used of ju, mm is permitted to restrict access to his blog and express his opinion that (to paraphrase some songwriter) it's all for the best when you say nothing at all.

**a joke is only a joke when someone other than you finds it funny. if no one laffs, an apology is much more appropriate than insisting your audience is too stupid, humorless, etc. to get it.

by 'don't like' you must mean 'damn near unable'

you wrote a large personal attack on me because your to stupid to understand what i wrote.


so now standard ju stand i am supposed to tell you not to write on any of my blogs. but i am better than that and you can write what ever you want with on the rules.

i had a b average in high school. because of my language skills. so telling me i cant wrote doesn't mean a whole lot to me. i do the best that i can at all times. can you say that no. nor can mm because i have seen you both write and spell as bad as i do.

i never delete nor blacklist anyone.

should someone decide to delete or edit one of my responses or comments, it'll be the last chance they get to do so cuz i'll never contribute anything to that blog again.




musta missed class whenever the topic was ambiguity. i can't tell if you're claiming some sorta accomplishment or if i should apologize for (inadvertantly) making fun of someone with a disability. a third possibility is that you went to a school in which classes were taught in some language other than english.




really?

i'd ask for some examples but i saw what happened when you made the same claim against gid so i know there's no point in insisting you provide some proof.
i really don't need to defend my my competent use of hand tools to guys with no fingers.

that is ok because i am not going to go through 5000 posts to look for examples.

as far as school is concerned it was in English. and i showed up everyday except when i was sick. as for personal attacks because someone isn't able to write or speak as well as you is just plain bad form.

what ever. i will shut up when everyone else does.

Oh lord, you crying over criticism again danielost? Dude, don't spend every minute of your life writing, sometimes barely understandable, short replies and then get mad when people criticize you for misspelling, grammatical errors and many times not having a clue what you are talking about.

Another thing, what is it with you and Col gene? I have by beef with Col, but I usually try to keep it in his own articles, unless he dares to wonder off onto other peoples articles which he is smart enough not to do often otherwise he gets bitch-slapped by the surplus. Once in a while I'll use him as a punch line for a joke. But you are about as obsessed with him as he is with Bush.

As much as me and Bee disagree, I'm gonna have to back him on this one. Even though I'm sure he'll probably say he don't need me to back him. I have to say his first reply was by far the best "smack in the face, you need to wake up and smell the coffee" reply I have read in a long time.

charles when you chewing someone out for misspelling then you really should make sure you have spelt everything in that post right.

Daniel,

Nobody here has done anything to hinder your free speech rights as guaranteed by the Constitution.

Get over yourself.

When you are on my blog you operate under my rules. When you are in my house, you operate under my rules. That is because I have rights to my property, be it intellectual or physical.

Again, I say, get over yourself.

Whining about your free speech rights doesn't make you look intelligent, but rather the contrary. No police have come to your house to haul you off to jail, nobody has threatened you or your property for speaking freely, we have simply expressed our opinions, which differ from yours.

If you didn't get it yet, get over yourself.

If you wish to participate when you're on my blog, go right ahead. But I can and I will express my opinions freely, even if those opinions include a request for you to climb into a deep hole and stay there.

and i repeat up until you pointed that out he is the only one besides me trying to give everyone a chance of free speach.


and by the way what he deleted was on subject.



and lets see i can't speach on some threads because i can't write as good as yous peoples.

i can't speach on other threads because i cant speelll as good as yous peoples.

now on my on thread i cant say something that is true about someone on this site.


its too bad that this whole site has so many better than thou idiots on it. you think your better than gene because he i an idiot. you think your better than me because i don't spell or write as bad as you.


as far as mm is concerned as i said in another thread. he thinks he is the only one who has a right to tell everyone what they can and cannot talk about. hence his thread about being upset about the religous right.

OMG. x 1,000,000,000,000,457

Oh, LW, you sure do know how to castrate someone verbally. ...perhaps physically, but I'm not one for finding that out.   

~Zoo

now who was that who told me not to mention gene.

For the record, danielost, I hae not deleted a single reply of yours.

What you don't seem to realize is that your freedom to spout idiotic nonsense is also MY freedom to CALL you on it!

We both have freedoms, and neither's is greater than the other's.