Published on October 28, 2007 By danielost In Current Events
it seems that the democrats aren't the only ones who don't believe in free speech isn't that right mm.


when ever i respond to something that he says and he doesn't like what i just said he tells me to shut up, not to write on his thread, or to stop posting all together.

and he isn't the only one isn't that right gid. true it has been awhile.

so whats the difference between you two and gene.

of course those three aren't the only ones doing it on here.

the only one i know of that hasn't done that is brad. even i have done it. but that was posts about my spelling and grammar. not about something i have posted. except once or twice with gene.

you people wonder why i usually only post 10 word responses it is because i don't like to write, or speak anymore than i have to. that being said i am not going any where. and when i decide something needs more than 10 words i use what ever i feel is needed.

mm this week has decided that the religious right doesn't have a freedom of speech.


Comments (Page 3)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Oct 30, 2007
When you threaten someone with bodily harm (butcher knife?) you have crossed waaaaay over the line. I reported your comment and I hope others will too.




there i turned myself in. i told you i cannot be black mailed.
on Oct 30, 2007
Ok, in that case I call it retardation with a touch of psycho thrown in for good measure.

FYI: here v. hear is not a spelling issue. They're homonyms.
on Oct 30, 2007
Ok, in that case I call it retardation with a touch of psycho thrown in for good measure.


no psycho with depresion


here is a place

hear is what you do weth your ears
on Oct 30, 2007
i didn't want to tell gid that he had used the wrong word. so i told him he had misspelled it.
on Oct 30, 2007
no psycho with depresion


here is a place

hear is what you do weth your ears


sorry this should read hear is what you do with your ears. i was trying to type and eat at the sametime with a cat on my lap.
on Oct 30, 2007
call it what you want. i call it defending myself from a bad person.




sorry i was not trying to say that gid was a bad person. but someone who would try to force me to do that to him.
on Oct 30, 2007
as for civil words. you attack me on a reguler basis and i keep myself civil toward you.


Bullshit, daniel. You have the worst persecution complex of anyone I've ever seen. I've been beyond civil to you lately.

But apparently you're some kind of masochist. I'm beginning to believe Lucas has a kid brother and you're it!
on Oct 30, 2007
No, Daniel. "From here on out" is the proper phrase. Believe me on this one. It is NOT "from hear on out" as you insist.

God, you're a riot. I honestly didn't believe anyone so pathetically stupid could turn on a computer, much less use one.
on Oct 30, 2007
oh, the second one. Didn't catch that one, LW.

He's right of course that it was misused. But I was pissed when I put it together. It was late, I was tired. Still, as TW said it was not technically a spelling error and at least it was flipping READABLE!

But I digress. I never claimed perfection, it's just that when my seven year old has a better sense of grammar and substance than you do, Danielost, it's quite frightening.

You're lying when you said I continually attacked you. I had resigned myself to let you stay in your corner while I stay in mine. But you have to be a piece of shit and call me out in the body of your article as one who has attacked you mercilessly, so I might as well start living up to the reputation you've carved out for me, shouldn't I?

You want to claim that I've stifled your free speech, daniel. SHOW ME WHERE! Not only have I not broken the law (stifling your free speech would actually involve hacking your JU account and deleting/editing your articles), but you seem to think that free speech begins and ends with you. You may have the right to say the most stupid, ignorant things ever uttered by a biological adult, but I have a right to call you a submoronic oaf with the intellectual capacity of a one celled organism. Free speech, as I mentioned earlier, swings both ways.
on Oct 30, 2007
Reply • Quote (Citizen)Gideon MacLeishOctober 29, 2007 23:53:25Reply #24
so your perfect and have never misspelled a word.


i have to meet you i have never meet a real perfect person before.


Blow me, asswipe!

You called me out on your thread...don't even THINK about hearing a civil word from me from hear on out, got it, cumchunk?




i am not the one who wrote hear on out you idiot. you wrote it. i corrected it to here on out for you. i have to deal with someone everyday who thinks he can do no wrong.
on Oct 30, 2007
Talking to yourself again, I see...


no i am trying to use small posts and words so that you and gid can understand me.


obviously gid cannot even understand what words he used and which ones i used.
on Oct 30, 2007
But I digress. I never claimed perfection, it's just that when my seven year old has a better sense of grammar and substance than you do, Danielost, it's quite frightening.




i don't really care what your 7 year old has. of course we can't all be perfect like gid who cannot write or spell when he is half a sleep. there is no reason for bad spelling. of course this rule is comming from mister perfect who doesn't ever misspell.
on Oct 30, 2007
seems that the democrats aren't the only ones who don't believe in free speech isn't that right mm.


when ever i respond to something that he says and he doesn't like what i just said he tells me to shut up, not to write on his thread, or to stop posting all together.

and he isn't the only one isn't that right gid. true it has been awhile.

so whats the difference between you two and gene.

of course those three aren't the only ones doing it on here.

the only one i know of that hasn't done that is brad. even i have done it. but that was posts about my spelling and grammar. not about something i have posted. except once or twice with gene.

you people wonder why i usually only post 10 word responses it is because i don't like to write, or speak anymore than i have to. that being said i am not going any where. and when i decide something needs more than 10 words i use what ever i feel is needed.

mm this week has decided that the religious right doesn't have a freedom of speech.




since i only used your name in this post once before you got mad. please tell me where on here do i say
You're lying when you said I continually attacked you.



on Oct 30, 2007
Your fucking article was WRITTEN as an attack on me, you paleolithic moron! Yes, there were other targets, but you called me out BY NAME!
on Oct 30, 2007
i was trying to type and eat at the sametime with a cat on my lap.


poor little daniel was making a flap
while eating & typing with the cat in his lap
he claims that's the reason he can't spell for crap
trying to eat with that cat on his lap
turns each type he tries to type into a tap
if he ain't wearing pants is it a felony rap
typing and eating with a cat in his lap?

4 Pages1 2 3 4