I like money

i don't

What was the topic of this article again?



LOL, I actually checked it, out of curiosity and the only word that came out wrong was chequer

OK can we get back on topic, or start it for that matter? Why? Becouse.

the topic is the democrats and gene and sometimes sean want us to surrender to al quida

I don't think Sean wants us to surrender, but I am sure he wants his party to win. He just doesn't get that they are both one in the same. BTRW, if what LW said is true then we should not be knocking on Sean's remarks if he can't be here to defend himself. It's not fair. I don't really care but it's not fair.

That, by the way, is another of your outright, bald faced LIES, danielost.

As long as you keep lying, you're not going to find me letting up! If I misspelled as much as you, I would have FAILED all of my college English classes, and gotten piss poor grades in the rest of them. I assure you, such has not been the case.

wow. I had a spelling fight once, but this one is far worse than mine!

OK your right not as much as me but in almost all of your posts. but when i use my spell checker i ignore your misspells and everyone else's when i quote them

F.

Are you aware that NAMES will often trigger a spell checker, danielost? Or common abbreviations?

I'll tell you what: next time I post any post with the numerous glaring spelling errors you allege, call me on them. If there are more than three LEGITIMATE spelling errors, I will retract everything I have said about your spelling. If I can defend them, then you need to take back everything YOU'VE said...deal?

why then i would not be any better than you

You won't because you CAN'T, danielost. If college professors can't do it, I assure you someone with spelling skills that are surpassed by my 9 year old would certainly not be able to do it.

take this to the other feed that is why i started it

How come I'm always the last one to find out?



LOL, that's why I said "I don't care", but I still wanted to be a little fair.



I don't know about it not being right. I don't see anything wrong with suggesting waiting till Sean comes back to give him a piece of your mind rather then spit on him while he's unable to defend himself. I figured it was a manner of being more honorable, more of a man to fight one on one, face to face rather then behind their backs. I personally don't really care f people want to tell me what to do, it's what I do with their suggestions that matter. People have the right to believe that I should stop or continue with something, I won't take that from them, doesn't mean I will listen to them either. Blacklisting is not a feature I consider necessary when it comes to debating. If you can't handle the argument you shouldn't be in a debate in the first place. To me blacklisting is a feature to stop things like spammers, children in an adult content article and just someone who is waaaaay to annoying that he wont even stick to the topic and is actually irritating even the website owners. But not because you don't like what the other person has to say. But hey, if daniel does not like it too bad. I was simply trying to be fair, even if it is Sean.

BTW, thanks for teaching me a new word. I never heard of admonish. I learn something new everyday I always say.