Maybe he's a visionary in dire need of contact lenses.

you mean like the word becouse

i supported that and still you called me an idiot or something



and as for me thinking people are loons.


i think everyone is a loon including myself.



i have never seen one link from gene for any of his claims. i may have missed them but i have never seen one.

Reply #16 is in response to:

"You are alleging a grand conspiracy to hide the text of the Constitution. A conspiracy that does not allow it to be taught in law schools (I provided support from LAW SCHOOL WEB SITES), a conspiracy that FORGED the original copy of the Constitution so that the MILLIONS who have viewed it have been duped, and yet sloppily hides it in a public library in San Francisco!"

I called you an idiot because you used YOUTUBE for your "support". I gave you the benefit of the doubt and asked google to define "becouse" and it did not define it. It seems rather odd that Google hasn't picked up on it!

There is no word 'becouse.' Of course, in these days, nobody can spell anymore. So of course you will get hits for it. But it's 'because!' Cause, as in, Col. Gene says Bush is the cause of all things bad in America. Couse? NO! NOT A WORD! GAH!!

Anyway, you're bigger message, as always, was lost completely before you even posted.

Acording to some on here, blah blah blah. Well, Danielost, are you some on here, or are you saying that we shouldn't surrender? And I don't know anyone on here who wants to surrender, but I do know some who want to bring the troops home. We can't surrender to the terrorists for the same reason we can't win the war - there's no telling who is on the other side to defeat or surrender to.

Well, the reason I gave him the benefit of the doubt is because spellcheck hates me, with my consistent use of British spellings (neighbour, behaviour, humour, grey) that were actually accepted in the US up until the turn of the 20th Century. I was willing to consider it may have been an anachronistic spelling.

as i said i have spilt it that way my whole life and never got it wrong on a spelling test in school.

i have gotten lots of words wrong but not that one so lets talk about something other than a word we won't agree on.


by the way gid you misspelled a word once too. and stated the samething.


oh and by the way it was my spellchecker that corrected it not me. so you must have spilt it wrong becouse my spellchecker spelled it the other way

OH, MY GAWD! I spelled a word wrong ONCE! I type upwards of 60 wpm, and a few minor misspellings stand out?

It's not about minor misspellings, danielost, it's about consistent and habitual misspellings, to which you are prone.

Yes, let's talk about something else (cough!secondamendmentcough!)

a spilling tist??



some on here don't feel any need to insult submoronic imbeciles.

no it is about you thinking you are better than me. you idiot. i do not go around thinking i am better than anyone. if i did i wouldn't waste my time on this site of losers. which i am one.


you have misspelled as much as i have. i just make the spell checker ignore them. i usually only correct my own misspells with it. besides i have said i can't spell.

but i guess you were to busy judging me to have read that.

i haven't been able to spell since i was in 2nd grade. but that and you will not shut me up.






i make mistakes gee i am sorry i am not as perfect as you trash are.

Wrong, Danielost. This is another of your many outright lies! If I make a typo, I assure you it is a slip of the fingers, not a lack of ability. I make a few typos, sure, but my grammar, spelling, and writing spells have been tested MANY times and have consistently passed the test. I dare say that college English professors have a little more knowledge than you in that department.

ANd now you say you've never been a perfect speller. After asserting that you always had "becouse" counted as right on your "spilling tists". I think your teacher was just trying to find a few words close enough to pass you on to the next grade. After all, you take NO correction, you refuse to admit when you are wrong, and you attack those who try to offer advice.

Ignorance is the lack of knowledge; stupidity is a REFUSAL to acquire knowledge. You, in my opinion, possess the latter!

the two of you keep telling me how bad a speller i am. at the same time you both are misspelling your own words to attack my spelling.


but where as i claim i cannot spell. you two idiots claim you can.


can anyone see a problem here.

i don't know what the correct spelling the word spilt spelt spelled is but does it really matter.


unlike you i try not to do personal attacks on people for their weakness. dictator gene not with standing, since his weakness is his brain.


as for the 2nd amendment i stated that it said that the right to bare arms was given to the citizens of the united states. To make the government think twice before entering your home.

and since the ones who were trying to get rid of the 2nd amendment was the government/police so they can enter a home without worrying about being shot it was working.


that should have told you that the government/police want to be able to come into your home, car, office, pockets, whatever anytime they want to without a warrant.


but i guess you were to stupid to get that little thing.

and in this thread i said you might be right.

but that i was trying to say what i said above. BUT NO SPELLING IS ALL YOU CARE ABOUT SO THE NEXT TIME YOU CHEW ME OUT ABOUT MY SPELLING. MAKE SURE YOU SPELL YOUR WORDS RIGHT.

No, I AM right, there is a difference!



Actually, I don't hit heavy on spelling, danielost. You are the ONLY individual I have so roundly criticized for your spelling. Because it is atrocious, often bordering on unreadable. In this thread I did not even comment until after you continued to insist it was an acceptable spelling.

The typos in my comments are actually quite few, danielost. My writing passes muster from some pretty high handed critics. You want me to categorically list yours? It would take all day!

i gave you three links and only one of them was youtube

the word because is the same as becouse.

the only difference is that because is the preferred spelling.

if you want i will look up more links with my spelling but i thought three would do it

and for the other i consider it closed.


poor babies ego is bruised becouse i won't submit to him. on one sugject and as i said i am not perfect and i don't want to be perfect. i just want to be me.

as far as i know you write for a living.

YOU CALLED ME A LIAR, DANIELOST! That WAS, that IS the point! You called me a liar despite my giving you MOUNTAINS of proof as to my position.

The problem you have is that you REFUSE to learn. You don't WANT to be educated. You'd rather make excuses and feel sorry for yourself!

You want to know my problem with you danielost? I'll lay it out for you:

You have a decent foundation for your ideas, but you're sloppy and lazy in your follow through. While you could take care to present a cohesive point, you don't even try, and when corrected, you go on the offensive. Frankly I don't care if "becouse" IS an alternative spelling (although NO dictionary sites I have found support that). It's a minor issue. What is NOT a minor issue is your refusal to engage in rational, intelligent discussion.

I KNOW there's more to you than that, danielost. I KNOW you can't possibly be as stupid as you present yourself to be. And yet you don't seem to care to even TRY!