our troops are not there for oil or for the people of iraq or afganistan

they are there for us. to make the world safer for you and me. to make it possible for people like the col. and sean to say that they are there becouse the president or the vice president or whomever to say that they are dieing for nothing.


the troops are there and dieing so that we can go to the grocery store.
so that we can go to the movies, the bars, or where ever when ever we want to go.

i know that you people will tell me that they are there becouse the president sent them there and that is true. but they joined the army knowing that they might be called to go to war. and they reason why they joined is so that if necassary they could protect us from the bad guys.

SO SAY WHAT YOU WANT ABOUT THE PRESIDENT OR VICE PRESIDENT OR WHOMEVER BUT STOP SAYING THE TROOPS ARE DIEING FOR NOTHING. THAT GOES FOR THE IDIOT COL. GENE since he is supposed to have been a col. he should know better than that.

so go ahead idiot col. and almost idiot sean now tell me how bad i am for supporting the troops.


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on May 21, 2007
where Adrian is they caught some local Iraqi guys f*cking a donkey on a surveillance video. Haha.

Those noble, noble Iraqis.


That's pretty sick, sis.

I echo your sentiment - stop dicking around with our boys and bring them out of the quagmire they're in right now.

I don't give a damn what this war was for - safety (bullshit in my opinion) or oil (a much more plausible option), but come on. We've created a culture that's obsessed with the use of military force first and foremost. That's not what the Founding Fathers intended (trite but true) . . . until we realize that military force is supposed to be the last tool we should use, we're gonna keep doing this again and again.

Vietnam ended only thirty years ago. How quickly we forget.
on May 21, 2007
We've created a culture that's obsessed with the use of military force first and foremost.
---Adnauseum

I hate this argument; how come you lefties never said this shit about the Soviet Union, with their endless parades of missiles, tanks and soldiers, filing past the Politburo members and Sec. General? How come you never call the Chinese warmongers? They do it, too. Why don't you? Because Communists are lefties, too. The lefties shoot down American military force, but say nothing at all about any Communist nation's militarism and totalitarianism. This makes you traitors. All of you. Sorry, but that's how I see it.
No one in this country WANTS to use military force "first and foremost" that's a great, big crock and you know it. Tell me where you get this mindset, please. I really wanna know.

Iraq has made the World more parlous rather than safer.
---adnauseum

Yeah...man, this is true; just look at all the devastating terrorist attacks in America, alone! OOPS! There aren't any! Keep trying, adnaus. The more this gets said, the stupider it makes the speaker look.
The sooner we come home without finishing the job, the sooner there WILL be attacks here. The sooner the Democrats shut the hell up and stop trying valiantly to lose the war for us, the sooner the military can cut loose, win, and come home.

on May 21, 2007
I hate this argument; how come you lefties never said this shit about the Soviet Union, with their endless parades of missiles, tanks and soldiers, filing past the Politburo members and Sec. General? How come you never call the Chinese warmongers? They do it, too. Why don't you? Because Communists are lefties, too. The lefties shoot down American military force, but say nothing at all about any Communist nation's militarism and totalitarianism. This makes you traitors. All of you. Sorry, but that's how I see it.
No one in this country WANTS to use military force "first and foremost" that's a great, big crock and you know it. Tell me where you get this mindset, please. I really wanna know.


I hate that you dismiss the validity of my argument so quickly. Go pick up The New American Militarism: How Americans are Seduced by War by Andrew Bacevich. Not that it will open your narrow mind, but you should read it anyway.
on May 21, 2007
Oh, and one more thing, rightwinger - how the hell does me being a "lefty" (which, let's face it, I'm really not all that much) make me a communist totalitarian and a traitor?

By your logic, you're a fascist, nazi traitor yourself.

Go suck a goat, partisan hack.

Sorry. That's how I see it.
on May 21, 2007
Go suck a goat


Or f*ck a donkey. Haha.

on May 21, 2007
Also, Afghanistan has an 'h' in it.
on May 21, 2007
I hate this argument; how come you lefties never said this shit about the Soviet Union, with their endless parades of missiles, tanks and soldiers, filing past the Politburo members and Sec. General? How come you never call the Chinese warmongers?


We're supposed to be a better country than that. We used to be. Believe me if the best defense you can come up with is that China and Russia are doing the same thing, we are really in a sad state.

Yeah...man, this is true; just look at all the devastating terrorist attacks in America, alone! OOPS! There aren't any! Keep trying, adnaus.


Oops, the terrorists that attacked our country were Saudis and I seem to remember a photo opp with Bush holding hands with Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah.

The sooner we come home without finishing the job, the sooner there WILL be attacks here. The sooner the Democrats shut the hell up and stop trying valiantly to lose the war for us, the sooner the military can cut loose, win, and come home.


The Republicans controlled the White House and the Congress for the FOUR years that the Iraq war has been going on. Explain to me how the Democrats are losing the war.

on May 21, 2007
Explain to me how the Democrats are losing the war.


the democrats are not losing the war but they want to. so that they can be elected in 2008
on May 21, 2007
the democrats are not losing the war but they want to. so that they can be elected in 2008


In turn, Bush wants to keep this shitstorm going so that someone else can clean up his mess when the Democrat gets elected in 2008 . . .
on May 21, 2007
non of which is a good reason to belittle the troops
on May 21, 2007
the people in control of the house and senate are the same ones that spit on the vietnam viets when they returned
on May 21, 2007
non of which is a good reason to belittle the troops






on May 21, 2007
non of which is a good reason to belittle the troops


on May 21, 2007
daniel: ??
on May 21, 2007
non of which is a good reason to belittle the troops


where in the world did you hear or read that ANYONE, Democrats in particular, belittling the troops?

When are you blind supporters of this war shut up and face the reality? your trick of hiding behind the troops is an old hat by now. stop using the troops as your cover. they deserve more honorable status than being your hiding screen.

The troops are under a military code, they go where the CIC sends them.NO questions asked. if they ask, they get court-martialed, when would you understand that? or are you playing dumb?

the cartoons of TW says it all. wake up and stop the nonsense.

my goodness .... after all that and you still saying these stupid things????

lefties, defeatists, traitors,... that is all you have?
3 Pages1 2 3