becouse i still say i didn't make a mistake there

At the risk of being bitch slapped for interfering, I put this here...

no, he hasn't. nor has he admitted anything else. and he has been given every opportunity to man-up and explain himself. he chooses to play these lil games like miler. but at least miler has the occasional fact on his side. this one has yet to put together a coherent point.

above here, i tried to give him a chance to step back and take a deep breath and was again met with rudeness and hostility.

i wash my hands...

no just bitch slapped

Try getting out of bed from the other side, it may help your mood. Lighten up.

Maybe I completely misread this, but I thought that the point was simply that the President was in a no-win situation on 9/11. Either the plane could be shot down (and the title of this article would have been the resulting headlines) or the plane could strike--not really a choice I would want to have to make. Unfortunately, from what I read, I'm not sure that there was really time to make such a choice anyway (well at least with the ones that hit the twin towers)--and it is unlikely that you are going to "choose" to take out a plane over one of, if not the world's busiest cities.

So, that's what I read the article to say--which leads me to wonder if I've become so far removed from political thought that giving the President the benefit of the doubt is somehow now a DU position. Seems just the opposite to me...

oh yea, and PS. did frogleg announce his/her retirement? what did we do to enjoy the pleasure of his/her return?

i guess the real question is what happened to the fourth plane

it hit the ground they found the hole but they didn't find the plane

there are plenty of pictures of plane parts at the crash site.

you can see a few of them here...WWW Link

true they found parts but they didn't find enough to make a plane from

and the miners that were killed 10 miles away 6 months later should be counted as part of the 9/11 attack

Dude . . . what have you been smoking?



Whatever it is, it's some strong shit, man . . .



Would you like to back up any of your (frivolous) assertions or are you content to shit out supposed information and force us to search through your piles of fecal material for coherent thought?

when that plane hit the ground it would have shaken the ground for miles around it even if you didn't actually feel it

the mine that collapsed wasn't dug properly

Please, for the love of all that is good, read and pay attention to this website: Punctuation. It is your friend.

Until you can learn to at least link to something that will prove your (again, I state: frivolous) assertions, and can learn that PERIODS ARE YOUR FRIEND and COMPLETE SENTENCES MAKE YOU SOUND MODERATELY COGENT, you will continue to be laughed at.

ok,,,there could be some validity to that, but that is not unlike all the people who are now suffering from or have died from all the dust, smoke and rubble that invaded their lungs on 9/11 in NYC and the surrounding areas.

so, if we count all those people,,,so what? does the number going from 1 to another make the tragedy any different? if the number was higher, does that change the justifications that we have made in our decisions since then?

i don't see how we could have reacted any stronger without just unleashing the nukes indiscriminately on the mid east. a higher casualty number wouldn't have affected our reaction.

and on your "where's the plane" point....ya can't have it both ways. you can't on one hand question if a plane even fell there and on the other hand, use the impact of that plane to add to the casualty numbers.

perhaps i am misreading what you are saying, and feel free to (politely) correct me if i misinterpret what you are saying...but that's what i gather.

So you are, literally, the only person in America who has access to the text of the Second Amendment? I have to wonder why they've posted a bogus copy of the Bill of Rights in our nation's capitol, written it wrongly in every civics textbook in America, taught it wrong to every lawyer in America, and yet given you special access?

You said you'd admit when you're wrong, you've just proven you won't. If you think I'm wrong, daniel, FIND THE TEXT AND PUBLISH IT WITH REFERENCES. You can't, because you're wrong, it's as simple as that. I've studied the Constitution FAR MORE extensively than you have, I can provide you with text references that I have in my library (The Heritage Guide to the Constitution being one), and yet you won't even bother to check to back up your alleged "facts".

i never questioned that the plane went down there

i said that they found the hole it made but not the plane itself

and i don't think the government could have moved it becouse a passenger jet is very big and someone would have noticed a skycrane flying with a damaged jet under it or a big truck again with a damaged jet on it

i just pointed out that they have not found the jet yet

one possibility is that it is buried at the crash site

and i believe they are trying to add the people suffering from smoke and dust to the numbers